{"id":244,"name":null,"username":"Rarma","avatar_template":"/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/3bc359/{size}.png","created_at":"2026-10-23T02:05:14.196Z","cooked":"\u003cp\u003eThanks for answering. In order:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. You’ve confirmed a standing Supervisor is in office today, and A272 was never put to them. Under 2.6.1 an Emergency Supervisor can be appointed “solely to the extent necessary or desirable”. Voters should know the Supervisor already in office was never asked.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. On-chain, those releases and milestones being met, weren’t a formality. You proposed all five (A116, A175, A209, A215, A271) and voted yes on each. Each passed with exactly three yes votes, the minimum the 75% threshold allows, and one of the three was yours.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. I haven’t alleged vote coordination. It isn’t in any of my posts. [collector identity or local reference removed] made that claim in post 54. You’re inferring it. Something on your mind?\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. “The conduct of any Director” is in item 3. Item 1 still defines the Adverse Event by reference to A272, and under 2.6.2 the reviewer can only act on the Adverse Event item 1 defines. Put it in item 1 and the review covers all four.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYour questions:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Answered in posts 39 and 46, and again in post 85: the Bylaws followed, one standard for all four Directors.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Put this on-chain with item 1 covering the conduct of all four Directors, or refer A272 to the Supervisor you’ve just confirmed is in office, who can demand information from every Director (2.5.2). I’d support either.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. There is no requirement for me to own, hold or stake LUNA. Nothing related to Terra, this forum or this proposal requires it. Why are you AGAIN trying to discredit someone for questioning this proposal in its current form? My history shows I engage wherever I think it’s necessary, and you can’t stop that.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYour interests, on the other hand, are relevant. ERIS, which lists you as CEO, takes 8% of ampLUNA staking rewards. Your topic 10 draft, put on-chain as 4844 by ERIS’s owner address, moved 30M LUNA of community funds into ampLUNA pools. Topic 10 doesn’t mention your ERIS role or that fee.\u003c/p\u003e","post_number":92,"post_type":1,"posts_count":88,"updated_at":"2026-10-23T02:05:14.196Z","reply_count":0,"reply_to_post_number":91,"quote_count":0,"incoming_link_count":3,"reads":13,"readers_count":12,"score":32.6,"yours":false,"topic_id":47,"topic_slug":"phoenix-foundation-appointment-of-an-emergency-supervisor","display_username":null,"primary_group_name":null,"flair_name":null,"flair_url":null,"flair_bg_color":null,"flair_color":null,"flair_group_id":null,"badges_granted":[],"version":1,"can_edit":false,"can_delete":false,"can_recover":false,"can_see_hidden_post":false,"can_wiki":false,"user_title":null,"reply_to_user":{"id":3,"username":"0xPhilipp","name":null,"avatar_template":"/user_avatar/forum.phoenix.money/0xphilipp/{size}/7_2.png"},"bookmarked":false,"raw":"Thanks for answering. In order:\n\n\n\n1\\. You've confirmed a standing Supervisor is in office today, and A272 was never put to them. Under 2.6.1 an Emergency Supervisor can be appointed \"solely to the extent necessary or desirable\". Voters should know the Supervisor already in office was never asked.\n\n\n\n2\\. On-chain, those releases and milestones being met, weren't a formality. You proposed all five (A116, A175, A209, A215, A271) and voted yes on each. Each passed with exactly three yes votes, the minimum the 75% threshold allows, and one of the three was yours.\n\n\n\n3\\. I haven't alleged vote coordination. It isn't in any of my posts. [collector identity or local reference removed] made that claim in post 54. You’re inferring it. Something on your mind?\n\n\n\n4\\. \"The conduct of any Director\" is in item 3. Item 1 still defines the Adverse Event by reference to A272, and under 2.6.2 the reviewer can only act on the Adverse Event item 1 defines. Put it in item 1 and the review covers all four.\n\n\n\nYour questions:\n\n\n\n1\\. Answered in posts 39 and 46, and again in post 85: the Bylaws followed, one standard for all four Directors.\n\n\n\n2\\. Put this on-chain with item 1 covering the conduct of all four Directors, or refer A272 to the Supervisor you've just confirmed is in office, who can demand information from every Director (2.5.2). I'd support either.\n\n\n\n3\\. There is no requirement for me to own, hold or stake LUNA. Nothing related to Terra, this forum or this proposal requires it. Why are you AGAIN trying to discredit someone for questioning this proposal in its current form? My history shows I engage wherever I think it's necessary, and you can't stop that.\n\n\n\nYour interests, on the other hand, are relevant. ERIS, which lists you as CEO, takes 8% of ampLUNA staking rewards. Your topic 10 draft, put on-chain as 4844 by ERIS's owner address, moved 30M LUNA of community funds into ampLUNA pools. Topic 10 doesn't mention your ERIS role or that fee.","actions_summary":[{"id":2,"count":1}],"moderator":false,"admin":false,"staff":false,"user_id":78,"hidden":false,"trust_level":1,"deleted_at":null,"user_deleted":false,"edit_reason":null,"can_view_edit_history":true,"wiki":false,"post_url":"/t/phoenix-foundation-appointment-of-an-emergency-supervisor/47/92","reactions":[{"id":"heart","type":"emoji","count":1}],"current_user_reaction":null,"reaction_users_count":1,"current_user_used_main_reaction":false,"can_accept_answer":false,"can_unaccept_answer":false,"accepted_answer":false,"topic_accepted_answer":null}