{"id":201,"name":null,"username":"Ex_TFL","avatar_template":"/user_avatar/forum.phoenix.money/ex_tfl/{size}/92_2.png","created_at":"2026-10-20T00:18:47.879Z","cooked":"\u003cp\u003eYou are asking the Terra community to rely on another future commitment while refusing to identify what authorized your departure from previous commitments\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAgain, your \u003ca href=\"https://github.com/phoenix-directive/docs/blob/7cebbd26048f0e1568a2aed55177090b90788d8b/common_backup/2024-08-12_24385_launching-terra-liquidity-alliance.md#L168-L169\" rel=\"noopener nofollow ugc\"\u003e2024 TLA proposal\u003c/a\u003e specified administration transfer after 1 month and ownership transfer after 3 months\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTwo years later, your \u003ca href=\"https://forum.phoenix.money/t/phoenix-foundation-appointment-of-an-emergency-supervisor/47/55\"\u003eexplanation\u003c/a\u003e is that you personally considered the board unsuitable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWho authorized you to replaced the published handover terms with your own personal opinions?\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eName the decision, the approving authority and the date it happened\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis, among many other documented issues, are all unanswered and have been repeatedly deflected by you\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYour latest proposal repeats the exact same dependency: remove an existing safeguard now, then rely on your future conduct during a supposedly “temporary” arrangement. The exact same sequence that you did not honor previously\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA restriction on how you promise to vote (with a proven track record of not keeping your word) is not the same as a restriction on what you can authorize\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA promise about how you will exercise power is not a limit on the power itself\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOnchain governance exists specifically to prevent the possibility for misuse of power, before it happens\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMeanwhile, it has been recorded that you have suspended several critics for “dissent” on an open governance forum\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGovernance loses all credibility the moment disagreement is censored at the same time proponents seek to push through highly contested props. Open discussion is a community good, in the Terra community’s best interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCensorship in the context of governance capture is significantly worse\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYou obviously cannot ask for “scrutiny” while excluding those who challenge your proposal and refusing to answer any direct questions or take any direct accountability for unfulfilled commitments\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStrong protections must be put into a proposal before asking for more power:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAn approved transition that prevents you and MB becoming sufficient authority alone\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIndependently assessed replacement candidates, with financial/personal relationships disclosed\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompletion of multi-year outstanding technical handovers\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eModeration independent of everyone involved in these conflicts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIt should go without saying: another future promise does not resolve unfulfilled commitments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProduce the exact authorization you had to capture administration / ownership rights long term, or complete the full handover now\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePut new safeguards in new proposals before asking the Terra community to surrender existing ones\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","post_number":59,"post_type":1,"posts_count":59,"updated_at":"2026-10-20T00:20:13.227Z","reply_count":0,"reply_to_post_number":null,"quote_count":0,"incoming_link_count":0,"reads":5,"readers_count":4,"score":0,"yours":false,"topic_id":47,"topic_slug":"phoenix-foundation-appointment-of-an-emergency-supervisor","display_username":null,"primary_group_name":null,"flair_name":null,"flair_url":null,"flair_bg_color":null,"flair_color":null,"flair_group_id":null,"badges_granted":[],"version":1,"can_edit":false,"can_delete":false,"can_recover":false,"can_see_hidden_post":false,"can_wiki":false,"user_title":null,"bookmarked":false,"raw":"You are asking the Terra community to rely on another future commitment while refusing to identify what authorized your departure from previous commitments\n\nAgain, your [2024 TLA proposal](https://github.com/phoenix-directive/docs/blob/7cebbd26048f0e1568a2aed55177090b90788d8b/common_backup/2024-08-12_24385_launching-terra-liquidity-alliance.md#L168-L169) specified administration transfer after 1 month and ownership transfer after 3 months\n\nTwo years later, your [explanation](https://forum.phoenix.money/t/phoenix-foundation-appointment-of-an-emergency-supervisor/47/55) is that you personally considered the board unsuitable\n\n**Who authorized you to replaced the published handover terms with your own personal opinions?**\n\n**Name the decision, the approving authority and the date it happened**\n\nThis, among many other documented issues, are all unanswered and have been repeatedly deflected by you\n\nYour latest proposal repeats the exact same dependency: remove an existing safeguard now, then rely on your future conduct during a supposedly \"temporary\" arrangement. The exact same sequence that you did not honor previously\n\nA restriction on how you promise to vote (with a proven track record of not keeping your word) is not the same as a restriction on what you can authorize\n\nA promise about how you will exercise power is not a limit on the power itself\n\nOnchain governance exists specifically to prevent the possibility for misuse of power, before it happens\n\nMeanwhile, it has been recorded that you have suspended several critics for \"dissent\" on an open governance forum\n\n**Governance loses all credibility the moment disagreement is censored at the same time proponents seek to push through highly contested props. Open discussion is a community good, in the Terra community's best interests**\n\nCensorship in the context of governance capture is significantly worse\n\nYou obviously cannot ask for \"scrutiny\" while excluding those who challenge your proposal and refusing to answer any direct questions or take any direct accountability for unfulfilled commitments\n\n**Strong protections must be put into a proposal before asking for more power:**\n\n* **An approved transition that prevents you and MB becoming sufficient authority alone**\n* **Independently assessed replacement candidates, with financial/personal relationships disclosed**\n* **Completion of multi-year outstanding technical handovers**\n* **Moderation independent of everyone involved in these conflicts**\n\n**It should go without saying: another future promise does not resolve unfulfilled commitments**\n\n**Produce the exact authorization you had to capture administration / ownership rights long term, or complete the full handover now**\n\n**Put new safeguards in new proposals before asking the Terra community to surrender existing ones**","actions_summary":[],"moderator":false,"admin":false,"staff":false,"user_id":84,"hidden":false,"trust_level":1,"deleted_at":null,"user_deleted":false,"edit_reason":null,"can_view_edit_history":true,"wiki":false,"post_url":"/t/phoenix-foundation-appointment-of-an-emergency-supervisor/47/59","reactions":[],"current_user_reaction":null,"reaction_users_count":0,"current_user_used_main_reaction":false,"can_accept_answer":false,"can_unaccept_answer":false,"accepted_answer":false,"topic_accepted_answer":null}